Search for: "D.C. ORGANIC ACT OF 1871" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2021, 9:30 am by Rohini Kurup
It also accuses the defendants of violating D.C. law by committing “bias-motivated acts of terrorism. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:46 am
Upon the passage of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, the three governments were unified under a single District government and made coterminous, ending Washington County's separate identity.... [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The act also organized the unincorporated territory within the District into five political entities. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Sixth Circuit (over a dissent): Section 1983 (a descendant of the 1871 Civil Rights Act) does not give rise to Contracts Clause claims. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Kristina Lorch, John Sullivan Baker
§ 1985(1), part of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 that protects federal officials from conspiratorial acts intended to prevent them from performing their duties. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:18 am by Nicholas Mosvick
By 1871, in Tarble’s Case, Justice Stephen Field spoke of conscription as a clear power of Congress. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm by Jason C. Brown
In addition, the legislature has provided a series of links directed to organizations on both sides of the debate. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:46 pm by Margaret Wood
Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1979, p.39). [read post]
  Section 1985(1) was established by the 1871 Third Enforcement Act, also known as the Second Ku Klux Klan act—the culmination of a series of measures meant to (and that eventually did) destroy the first Ku Klux Klan. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
He was expressly authorized to do so by the 1870 Enforcement Act, and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm by John Ross
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: the origins of Section 1983—originally known as Section 1 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Consistent with the statutory text and context, we hold that the 1872 Amnesty Act removed the Fourteenth Amendment’s eligibility bar only for those whose constitutionally wrongful acts occurred before its enactment. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am by Karl Mihm
  Update-1: On May 18, 2021, a spokesperson for New York’s Attorney General said, “We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the organization is no longer purely civil in nature. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Before the Supreme Court's Heller (2008) (D.C. cannot ban handguns) and McDonald v. [read post]